Thread:Pecoes/@comment-4674838-20121012013714/@comment-3508190-20121017232824

That's one way to read it, yes. Okay. Sure. But how about this: The first thing that should catch your attention is not the closure but the timeout. The timeout is relevant. The closure is of minor interest. If you frame the timeout with the closure, you reverse that hierarchy. So why not frame the closure with the timeout?